<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: You are dead to me or don&#8217;t like me.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.weberika.com/2010/02/04/bad-email-marketing-tactic/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.weberika.com/2010/02/04/bad-email-marketing-tactic/</link>
	<description>Social Media &#38; Marketing Strategist</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 31 Jul 2011 11:55:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Witt</title>
		<link>http://www.weberika.com/2010/02/04/bad-email-marketing-tactic/comment-page-1/#comment-48</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Witt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 18:37:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.weberika.com/?p=97#comment-48</guid>
		<description>My first thought was, &quot;that&#039;s an absolutely brilliant way to get people to click on links leading to malware [trojans that create botnets etc.]&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My first thought was, &#8220;that&#8217;s an absolutely brilliant way to get people to click on links leading to malware [trojans that create botnets etc.]&#8220;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Roach</title>
		<link>http://www.weberika.com/2010/02/04/bad-email-marketing-tactic/comment-page-1/#comment-45</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Roach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 21:29:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.weberika.com/?p=97#comment-45</guid>
		<description>I agree, to assume I am not worthy because I take no action is VERY short sighted. I know in marketing, that everyone is not in need of my services at the same time. I also know that just being exposed to my subject line is doing my brand some good if only for the awareness perspective.

I do segment the openers and email to that group from time-to-time. I NEVER take my list for granted and always try to provide great information. I am a solutions provider.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, to assume I am not worthy because I take no action is VERY short sighted. I know in marketing, that everyone is not in need of my services at the same time. I also know that just being exposed to my subject line is doing my brand some good if only for the awareness perspective.</p>
<p>I do segment the openers and email to that group from time-to-time. I NEVER take my list for granted and always try to provide great information. I am a solutions provider.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linda</title>
		<link>http://www.weberika.com/2010/02/04/bad-email-marketing-tactic/comment-page-1/#comment-39</link>
		<dc:creator>Linda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 03:14:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.weberika.com/?p=97#comment-39</guid>
		<description>What some marketers go to when they need site visitors to increase their site popularity and/or Google ranking. Sad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What some marketers go to when they need site visitors to increase their site popularity and/or Google ranking. Sad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Leblond</title>
		<link>http://www.weberika.com/2010/02/04/bad-email-marketing-tactic/comment-page-1/#comment-36</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Leblond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 21:42:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.weberika.com/?p=97#comment-36</guid>
		<description>This is a valid method of segmenting a list, though it should have been done in a much more professional manner.  

Cost savings for slimming down a list  could be considerable.  It&#039;s not uncommon for companies to send millions of emails over the course of a year. If each one costs an average of even just one cent to send, that still adds up fast. 4,000,000 x .01 = $40,000/year.  Of course, even removing 50,000 names only saves $500, but it’s money that can be used elsewhere.

While it is possible that you may have been away from your machine for six months, it seems unlikely that would be the case for most people.   It’s more likely the mail is either being deleted (with images off) or just going into a spam bucket.

Like you, I often will copy the URL into my browser rather than click - but we are techies, and probably in the minority.

Now having said all of that...once you remove someone from your list that does not mean it must be forever.  That&#039;s even true for people that opt out.  CANSPAM allows you to periodically send a non-marketing message to those people and ask them if they would like to re-subscribe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a valid method of segmenting a list, though it should have been done in a much more professional manner.  </p>
<p>Cost savings for slimming down a list  could be considerable.  It&#8217;s not uncommon for companies to send millions of emails over the course of a year. If each one costs an average of even just one cent to send, that still adds up fast. 4,000,000 x .01 = $40,000/year.  Of course, even removing 50,000 names only saves $500, but it’s money that can be used elsewhere.</p>
<p>While it is possible that you may have been away from your machine for six months, it seems unlikely that would be the case for most people.   It’s more likely the mail is either being deleted (with images off) or just going into a spam bucket.</p>
<p>Like you, I often will copy the URL into my browser rather than click &#8211; but we are techies, and probably in the minority.</p>
<p>Now having said all of that&#8230;once you remove someone from your list that does not mean it must be forever.  That&#8217;s even true for people that opt out.  CANSPAM allows you to periodically send a non-marketing message to those people and ask them if they would like to re-subscribe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kelly</title>
		<link>http://www.weberika.com/2010/02/04/bad-email-marketing-tactic/comment-page-1/#comment-35</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 18:38:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.weberika.com/?p=97#comment-35</guid>
		<description>I got the same email today so we are on the same marketer&#039;s list.  Needless to say, I thought the same thing.  I didn&#039;t bother replying - if he doesn&#039;t want me on his list, then I don&#039;t want to be there.  :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got the same email today so we are on the same marketer&#8217;s list.  Needless to say, I thought the same thing.  I didn&#8217;t bother replying &#8211; if he doesn&#8217;t want me on his list, then I don&#8217;t want to be there.  <img src='http://www.weberika.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cameron</title>
		<link>http://www.weberika.com/2010/02/04/bad-email-marketing-tactic/comment-page-1/#comment-34</link>
		<dc:creator>Cameron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 18:32:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.weberika.com/?p=97#comment-34</guid>
		<description>When I read this I clearly get the message that &quot;if you aren&#039;t doing anything that benefits me you are no longer welcome to email me&quot;

There are easier ways to cull names off email lists without alienating everyone on them.

This guy is a douche and doesn&#039;t even deserve a reply.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I read this I clearly get the message that &#8220;if you aren&#8217;t doing anything that benefits me you are no longer welcome to email me&#8221;</p>
<p>There are easier ways to cull names off email lists without alienating everyone on them.</p>
<p>This guy is a douche and doesn&#8217;t even deserve a reply.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vicky</title>
		<link>http://www.weberika.com/2010/02/04/bad-email-marketing-tactic/comment-page-1/#comment-33</link>
		<dc:creator>Vicky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 18:31:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.weberika.com/?p=97#comment-33</guid>
		<description>You are DEAD ON (and should tell him to go ahead and consider you DEAD to him, too lol)

I&#039;m not really sure how it will save him so much money that it warrants doing this at all.  However, if is list is that astronomically large, he should have better methods for figuring out who is &quot;active&quot; and who isn&#039;t.  At minimum, he could have written that email in a much more professional manner.  What&#039;s with the guilt trip?  I, too, would feel bullied.

If I were that desperate and technically inept... and truly wanted to know who is interested and who isn&#039;t... I&#039;d send out a note stating that the mailing list has been revamped and interested users should please re-subscribe.   

There are many ways to go about this.  I think your instincts are correct... it&#039;s a ploy to get traffic today in spite of his money-saving B.S.   

I&#039;d have done 1 of 3 things were I you upon receiving that email

1. Do nothing and wait for the next email to come along.  When it&#039;s revealed that you were never removed, tell him he&#039;s full of crap and to get bent.

2. Replied with &quot;you just assured that I will no longer be interested.  Please remove me.

3. Replied with &quot;get bent.&quot;

(In other words, I applaud your efforts at education and diplomacy cuz I wouldn&#039;t have wasted the time on him.  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are DEAD ON (and should tell him to go ahead and consider you DEAD to him, too lol)</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not really sure how it will save him so much money that it warrants doing this at all.  However, if is list is that astronomically large, he should have better methods for figuring out who is &#8220;active&#8221; and who isn&#8217;t.  At minimum, he could have written that email in a much more professional manner.  What&#8217;s with the guilt trip?  I, too, would feel bullied.</p>
<p>If I were that desperate and technically inept&#8230; and truly wanted to know who is interested and who isn&#8217;t&#8230; I&#8217;d send out a note stating that the mailing list has been revamped and interested users should please re-subscribe.   </p>
<p>There are many ways to go about this.  I think your instincts are correct&#8230; it&#8217;s a ploy to get traffic today in spite of his money-saving B.S.   </p>
<p>I&#8217;d have done 1 of 3 things were I you upon receiving that email</p>
<p>1. Do nothing and wait for the next email to come along.  When it&#8217;s revealed that you were never removed, tell him he&#8217;s full of crap and to get bent.</p>
<p>2. Replied with &#8220;you just assured that I will no longer be interested.  Please remove me.</p>
<p>3. Replied with &#8220;get bent.&#8221;</p>
<p>(In other words, I applaud your efforts at education and diplomacy cuz I wouldn&#8217;t have wasted the time on him.  <img src='http://www.weberika.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jaimie Field</title>
		<link>http://www.weberika.com/2010/02/04/bad-email-marketing-tactic/comment-page-1/#comment-32</link>
		<dc:creator>Jaimie Field</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 18:26:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.weberika.com/?p=97#comment-32</guid>
		<description>Wow!  In the annals of bad e-marketing this ranks right up there.  

Here&#039;s a tip:  don&#039;t insult your email list.  There was a different way to do this, as we both know - and that is to ask &quot;Do you still want to be on the list?&quot;  I often get that email from some of the lists to which I am subscribed and I answer yes to the ones I want to continue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow!  In the annals of bad e-marketing this ranks right up there.  </p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a tip:  don&#8217;t insult your email list.  There was a different way to do this, as we both know &#8211; and that is to ask &#8220;Do you still want to be on the list?&#8221;  I often get that email from some of the lists to which I am subscribed and I answer yes to the ones I want to continue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lola LB</title>
		<link>http://www.weberika.com/2010/02/04/bad-email-marketing-tactic/comment-page-1/#comment-31</link>
		<dc:creator>Lola LB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 17:14:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.weberika.com/?p=97#comment-31</guid>
		<description>This email would really leave a bad taste in my mouth were I to receive it.  I&#039;d like to think that I wouldn&#039;t be this rude to my users, knowing that sometimes people get too busy to visit websites or may have forgotten all about it, or some other reason.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This email would really leave a bad taste in my mouth were I to receive it.  I&#8217;d like to think that I wouldn&#8217;t be this rude to my users, knowing that sometimes people get too busy to visit websites or may have forgotten all about it, or some other reason.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

